Smoke Signals 2

January 14, 2006

News on Friday the 13th

Being that I tend to read more news than anything, I found a few stories for you today. In addition to being Friday the 13th, it’s also a full moon. In honor of what is quite possibly the strangest day possible, here are a few stories (though not all of them are “strange”). That being said, AWAY WE GO!


Man who BIT GIRLFRIEND’S FACE convicted of assault
I know, we live in a country where everyone has the right to a trial and the right to an attorney (thank you Miranda), but I can’t help but wonder just what the defense was in this case? In case you’re wondering too, they claimed that the victim was not “seriously disfigured”, to which the prosecutor replied “I will agree he is not guilty when he can put this back” and then held up a jar containing the flesh this sicko person BIT OFF OF HER FACE. I agree also with the prosecution that this wack-job person should not get a break simply because the victim had a talented plastic surgeon who was able to re-build her face. Therefore, may this (now) inmate ROT IN PRISON as a precursor to ROTTING IN HELL!
Porn homework cancelled in Ohio
It seems that no matter what, some people just don’t get it. A teacher in Brooklyn, OH recently assigned a group of freshmen (14 and 15 year olds) to “research internet pornography” and also to write about any experience they had with it. Well, the parents wouldn’t have this, and many called the school. So far, no mention has been made as to any punishment, but I doubt from the story if there will be any.
Things that make you go WHAT?
I don’t even know what to say here, except that maybe PUBLIC IMPALING of rapists, terrorists and drug dealers COULD reduce the number of those people in society, or at least teach them that their current “life style” is not a good move.
Well, at least she was “original”
A Phoenix woman was recently fined a little over $300 for driving in the HOV lane without another person in the car. When she was stopped and the officer asked her how many people were in the car, she said two, then pointed to her belly to indicate her unborn child. Well, while I do agree that the “fetus” IS a human being and not just a “lump of cells” that BECOMES a human being, I have to side with the court on this one. The last line of the story, which states that if this were allowed, cops would not only have to have cuffs, guns, and other tools, but also would have to carry pregnancy tests, and I have to agree we (as a society) DO NOT want to go there. But, I have a friend of mine who is a local Constable, and when he stops someone for speeding he tells them if they can give him an excuse he has NEVER heard, he’ll let them off with a warning. He’s heard them all, but the best one he told me about (which RUINED all Star Wars excuses from now on) was a teenager who simply replied “you don’t need to see my license, these aren’t the droids you’re looking for”, and he WAS carring several small robots for a class project. After my friend stopped laughing, he did let the kid go.
I am sorry to say this took place in my part of Texas
It seems that a local Police Chief has something against people of asian descent, and when a Vietnamese man applied for a job as a Farmer’s Branch Police Officer, the Chief (allegedly) said that “as long as I’m police chief, we won’t have any gooks in this department.” I’m sorry, but even IF this man was traumatized during the Vietnam War, this is NOT the way one should act in ANY JOB! I personally hope to see this man FIRED and not able to get a job ANYWHERE as a police officer (or with a PD at all) ever again!
Mexico DEMANDS the U.S. allow more immigration
Well, if this is the case, I say the U.S. DEMAND that Mexico begin helping us to make sure the immigration is LEGAL and not any way else. I also DEMAND that Mexico begin taking care of it’s own issues, like poverty, drugs, other crime, and so on…..

I guess I just won’t understand it, but it seems that when ANY COUNTRY ON EARTH (except the U.S.) takes measures to protect their borders, they are simply “protecting their home land”, but when America wants to protect our borders, we are “turning our backs” on “the poor and downtrodden” who simply want to “work and earn a living, doing jobs Americans won’t do”. I’ve gotten into this debate on campus quite a few times, and my answer is most often, that if the jobs “Americans won’t do” paid an decent wage (and Ogre, I’m not advocating minimum wage raises) and offered benefits and advancement opportunities, maybe Americans WOULD take the jobs. But, when you can hire 3 or 4 illegal aliens for the same rate as ONE citizen or legal resident, why would you?


With all the kerfuffal (thanks to Letters from NYC for the new word) over President Bush’s program which uses wire taps on calls to and from KNOWN TERRORISTS or TERRORIST SYMPATHIZERS, I just thought I’d throw out a few links about the DNC’s “golden boy”.
Link Number 1

Link Number 2


Zarqawi to Bin Laden - U.S. Winning in Iraq

CAN IT BE? Is the enemy starting to realize that we (the U.S.) WILL NOT REST until we have his (and his boss’s) head ON A PLATTER? I’m sorry, but I just don’t see how it took THIS STINKING LONG for Zarqawi to realize HE IS GOING TO LOSE, but the real question is, will he realize it before or after he begins ROTTING IN THE GRAVE?
Cross-Posted at Smoke Signals Blog

December 14, 2005

Should the 14th Amendment be changed?

There is no doubt that one of the biggest questions and issues on the minds of most Americans is illegal immigration. One of the “loopholes” for illegal immigrants is the “anchor baby”. What happens is that a couple comes over and the woman gives birth to a child here. Under the current wording of the 14th amendment, that child is automatically a citizen, and the parents are not able to be deported, not to mention that the child also qualifies for welfare and medicare.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
I want to make clear that I am NOT advocating anything that would deny basic human rights to anyone, but this is more than that. Doctors in America WILL NOT turn the mother away, because their oath as as medical doctor they will make sure they give the mother and the child the care and treatment they need. The question arises though, should the American tax payer be FORCED to pay for that child for 18 years?

There are two schools of thought here. The first, and I see the point in a way, would change the 14th amendment to no longer allow anchor babies, thus saying that anyone born here, but born to parents who are here ILLEGALLY, will be returned to their parents’ home country as soon as is safe for the child, and the parents go too. The second school, which also has merit, would return the parents to their home country almost immediately, but the child (who would still be a citizen) would be placed in the care of the state to await adoption. The argument here is that this is almost facism or stalinism. The question is though, if the child is a citizen, they have all the rights that other citizens have, and therefore to send them home with the parents would violate those rights, but to allow the parents to stay is an undue burden on the American tax payer. If the parents are fleeing for their lives, that is different, but most aren’t, and therefore these are pretty much the only two ways to make a change, should one be made.

Some say that to do this is still forcing the tax payer to pay for the child, but not really. If the children are adopted, then they will have a good home, and their adoptive parents would pay for them. Even if only 40% to 50% of them are adopted, that reduces the tax burden quite a bit, and also ensures the money from taxes is going to support the child, NOT to the parents who may or may not use it for the child.

Mostly, we need to make a choice, we have seen what un-restricted immigration does to a country (see France riot situation), and we now need to either take a stand and say that we still want people who want a better life to have that opportunity, but we REQUIRE they do it right, or we need to just lay down and let our country be invaded continually, as it is being invaded now.

So, what am I asking you to do? Call, fax, write, or e-mail your Congressman (in the House especially) and let them know where you stand on this issue. We elect them to represent us, but how can they represent us if they do not know where we stand? You can bet anything you want that the aclu will be chiming in on this one.

Cross posted at Smoke Signals Blog

December 12, 2005

Monday News Bytes

Group to protest “Republican Death Machine”
And, NO, Ogre, you can’t have one for Christmas, EEEEEEEEVIL GLENNNNNNNNNN has already bought them all. Kidding aside, it seems that “the left” has NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER with the MURDER of innocent babies (see: abortion), nor do they have ANY PROBLEMS with brutal dictators being left in power to murder MILLIONS of people (see: sadaam hussein and the current DNC position on the war they did vote to start), but when a CONVICTED MURDERER is sentenced to death for killing FOUR PEOPLE, they are outraged. Stanley “Tookie” Williams, a former gang member, and current resident of California’s death row, is scheduled to be executed at 12:01AM on Tuesday 12/13 for the 1979 murder of four people. Now, I will grant “tookie” that he does seem to have shown SOME maturity in that he now writes children’s books teaching to stay AWAY from gangs, drugs, and guns, but he has NOT renounced his own time with them as he has not stopped using his “gang name” (tookie). I have no doubt that people can change, and can be redeemed and forgiven for any sin they commit, but just because you see the error of your ways, and repent does NOT free you from responsiblity for your actions. Mr. Willims MURDERED four people, and the court decided his life should be forfeit due to that, therefore, his sentence should be carried out. The main problem I have here is that there is going to be a protest in DC (which is a long way from California) to DEMAND that Gov. Schwarzeneggar grant clemency and commute his sentence to life in prison. I’m sorry, I didn’t realize that a small group of people had the right to DEMAND a government official do anything, if I had known, I would have DEMANDED that Pres. Clinton tell the truth under oath, or that Sen. Kennedy tell the truth about the woman he murdered (by doing nothing he is responsible for her death), or I would DEMAND that Sen. Kerry tell the truth about EVERYTHING he did from the day he returned to the U.S. from Vietnam until today (including throwing his medals away, lying about what went on, visiting the VC in France, and on and on and on), but I guess I missed out on those opportunities, didn’t I?
Leaders of faith mark holiday season by bashing Wal-Mart
It seems that no matter what, the unions are just not going to give up until Wal-Mart FORCIBLY unionizes their workers. The ONLY instance I know of where a store closed to avoid unionizing was IN CANADA and therefore does NOT come to this debate, but you know what, if enough Wal-Mart employees wanted to unionize, they could, and I’ll tell you how. The employees hold the reigns, even if they don’t know it. Because if a large percentage of the work force at a company threatened to quit if they couldn’t unionize, the company would at least have to listen and talk it over, otherwise THE COMPANY WOULD BE CRIPPLED! So, let me QB this for you, say the employees of Wal-Mart want to unionize, and they get 75% of their fellow workers to side with them. Then, a letter is sent to the corporate office telling Wal-Mart that unless they are allowed to unionize, the company will be faced with a SEVENTY FIVE PERCENT drop in staffing, and therefore WOULD BE LITERALLY CRIPPLED! Therefore, why not just (and this is dangerous thinking folks) LET THE WORKERS DECIDE IF THEY WANT TO UNIONIZE? American Airlines call centers were HARASSED at least monthly by union reps at our front gate (some of whom would BLOCK THE DRIVEWAY until you talked to them, or looked like you would run them over), yet each time a vote came up, the employees VOTED NO and AA never changed the pay or benefit package to get that to happen. So, the lesson, if people are WILLING to work for the wages Wal-Mart pays, and those employees DO NOT WANT A UNION, then why is it OK to try to FORCE A UNION ON THEM?
University drops charges against student for opposition to homosexuality
This is a RARE victory for free speech (seeing as it was NOT in support of homosexuality or any other “far left” cause). It seems that a professor sent an e-mail to students inviting them to view a movie about a lesbian couple. Jihad Daniel, a 63 year old grad student, and recent convert to Islam, responded with a request to not receive any further correspondance along this line, as he believes homosexuality is a perversion. Well, that just cannot be allowed can it. Someone not agreeing with the far left on a college campus. Well, a letter of reprimand was placed in Mr. Daniel’s permanent record, and he was charged with harassment as well, seeing as the professor found his e-mail to be “threatening”. Well, a group called F.I.R.E. (Foundation for Individual Rights in Education) took up the charge in support of Mr. Daniel, and the school has dropped the charges and removed the letter of reprimand.

When did it come to this? When did simply saying you do not agree with something become a threat? I’m sorry folks, but if I get an e-mail from a professor about something like this, I am DEFINATELY going to ask to be removed from his list for these invites, and I’m going to say why. I can also guarantee that if that professor accuses me of “threatening”, I will take him to court for slander and any other charge I can, and I will have a copy of the e-mail to prove what I said. This was not a threat, this was a man who disagrees with a professor, simply voicing his view, and asking to be removed from her e-mail list.


Democrats pitch “national community”
I’m sorry, but haven’t we seen this before from Senator Hillary “it takes a village” Clinton? I just understand, is the DNC just that dense? This didn’t work the first time, why would it now? Americans don’t want a “national community”, and do you know why? Because New Yorkers are proud to be New Yorkers, just as Texans are proud(er) to be Texans, and so on. We don’t want to be told that everyone is the same, and all that rubbish. Texans are better than anyone else on the planet at some things, why NY has it’s strengtth, and so one. Differences are what made this country strong. Different skills and different talents being harnessed and used. I just don’t see this working, do you?
AND, LAST, BUT CERTAINLY NOT LEAST!

Democrats: Dishonest On Iraq (streaming video link)


Well, that’s it for now, I have three more finals this week, and I’m house sitting for a neighbor and the dogs need me right now. Until next time, MERRY CHRISTMAS






















Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome | Theme designs available here